if we use commonPool, we should split work more than just to number of threads
best option, not use commonPool at all
please note, that manual implementation (even after 1,2 fixes) is two times slower than JDK parallel stream
1. some work should be done in caller thread
2. if we use commonPool, we should split work more than just to number of threads
3. best option, not use commonPool at all
4. please note, that manual implementation (even after 1,2 fixes) is two times slower than JDK parallel stream
best option, not use commonPool at all
please note, that manual implementation (even after 1,2 fixes) is two times slower than JDK parallel stream
Benchmark shows something around 20% slower than builtins, which is acceptable